The Concussion Lawsuit Against The National Hockey League (2016)
Controversy
The National Hockey League Logo |
The National Hockey
League was established in 1917 as the main professional hockey league in the
world. Its focus has been to provide entertainment for fans, by displaying the
world’s top hockey talent. The league draws many highly skilled players from
all over the world and currently has players from approximately 20 different
countries. Like any professional sports organization, the league thrives off
this talent they put on display, and that is what has made the NHL so
successful over the years.
In 2013, former National
Hockey League players filed a lawsuit against the league for their neglect
towards the issue of concussions in the NHL. The NHL has been fighting the
validity of the case since it has been filed, but in 2016, a U.S. District
judge in Minnesota refused to dismiss the case. (Dobuzinskis, 2016) This
validates the case in a sense that the judge saw the actions by these former
players as reason for legal recourse. For years, the NHL has tried to avoid
addressing the issue of concussions in hockey. The reality is, hockey is a
fast-paced, violent sport that can result in many serious injuries, concussions
being the most common.
Dr. Bennet Omalu |
We have seen concern regarding concussions emerge
as years go on, especially in the National Football League, where Dr. Bennet
Omalu discovered the correlation between playing football and concussions. His
studies went on to show how concussions lead to a condition called CTE (Chronic
Traumatic Encephalopathy) which is a degenerative brain disease derived from
multiple concussions over time. This is the concern that the former NHL players
have, that concussions players receive throughout their hockey careers could
lead to permanent brain damage such as CTE. The Minnesota judge confirmed these
players concerns as valid by refusing to throw out the case when appealed by
the NHL. The NHL’s actions towards this lawsuit are reflective of how they have
treated concussions and player safety over time. There has always been a sense
of neglect when it comes to how active the National Hockey League is in taking
care of the overall health of their players.
Hockey players are known as ‘tough guys’, for
example, players have been known to get injuries from play such as cuts
stitched up during a game and return to that same game to play. We are talking
about guys who get hit with 95+ mph slap shots in the face, and only miss part
of that same game before returning. As a league, the NHL likes the idea of
their players being known as these ‘tough guys’ because the fans and viewers at
home know that hockey is a rough and tough sport. As tough as these players
are, player safety is no joke, and the players themselves have spoken out more
and more over the years about the league’s neglect towards player safety.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders are anyone
who is affected by the actions of a company. The stakeholders in this NHL case
are the league, the players, the players’ families, fans, and the teams. The
league and the players are obviously the most directly affected by the
situation, being the two who are in the
legal suit. Though, one must be mindful of all the people who branch off both
the league and the players. For the league, the teams within the league are
effected by concussions, losing players to injury quite often due to the length
and seriousness of a head injury, teams can lose players that have a positive
impact on their team’s ability. Missing these players could negatively affect
team revenue, if the team is missing their star player then they could lose a
percentage of fan interest. As for the player’s side, players and their
families are both negatively affected by concussions, and even more-so if these
concussions lead to brain damage later in life. Lastly, the fans are the ones
who keep the league going, their support and opinions are what matter to the
league because the fans are their source of income, this makes the fans a
crucial stakeholder in this dilemma.
Individualism
Individualism
focuses on maximizing profits while staying within the constraints of the law.
Individualism is very relevant in this case, obviously, like any business, the
NHL’s goal is to maximize profits for their organization. Yet, the second part
of individualism is tricky, is putting these players at risk of serious injury
within constraints of the law? This is the issue that the former players filed
the suit based on. The NHL makes money off these players going out on the ice
and putting their well-being on the line. Many careers of players will be cut
short due to injury, such as Marc Savard, a
player forced into retirement due
to an excessive number of head injuries in 2010. He was considered to be one of the league's top players when he played for the Boston Bruins before his career came to an abrupt end due to concussions. The NHL would make the case
that the danger they expose their athletes to is not illegal. The players are required
to sign contracts to play in the NHL and the league would argue that the
players know what they are signing up for. The players may make a case,
however, that the NHL has not done extensive enough research to present the
possible risk of head injuries involved with playing pro hockey. So, although
it is certain that the NHL is maximizing its profits, whether or not they are
abiding by the law is, to a degree, in question.
Marc Savard playing for the Boston Bruins |
Utilitarianism
Passionate Fans Frustrated with the 2012-13 NHL Lockout |
Utilitarianism
is based on happiness of stakeholders. Basically, the idea behind
utilitarianism is to make decisions that don’t necessarily always bring in the
highest profit, but rather make decisions that benefit all of your
stakeholders. Because the ethical dilemma is between two stakeholders in the
company, it is clear that utilitarianism was not being considered by the NHL.
The players are arguably the largest stakeholder in the National Hockey League.
Obviously, the reason this Concussion Suit was filed is because there is a
large percentage of the players who are unhappy with the league’s concern for
their well-being. If the NHL is neglecting a stakeholder, then clearly they are
not working to try and make them happy. When the players and the league are in
disagreement, it often results in none of the stakeholders being happy. The
league and the players have had disagreements before, and these disagreements
do not always go well, the last issue seen was an NHL Lockout in 2012-2013
which resulted in half of the hockey season being missed due to the failure to
agree on a new Collective Bargaining Agreement. This situation left no
stakeholders happy, so as you can see the NHL does not have the best history of
keeping stakeholders happy, especially the players themselves. The players
filing a lawsuit against the league is just another instance of the two
disagreeing on crucial issues within the game of hockey.
Kantianism
Kantianism is
based around rational decision making, autonomy of individuals, and honesty and
freedom (Salazar, 20). Kantianism focuses on good will, and not performing
unethical actions under any circumstances, such as using people for your own
personal gain. Overall, it seems that Immanuel Kant, the philosopher behind the
idea of Kantianism, believed in being true to people while doing what is right.
The
NHL is not following Kantianism because of their use of their players. The
players were not fully briefed on the long-term risks that come with head
injuries from playing hockey. This can certainly be seen as the league using
their players for their own personal gain, while the players are underinformed
about the risks of injury. The league is not being true with their players and
therefore they are not following the ways of Kantianism. This hinders the players’
ability to make rational decisions about playing hockey, or treating their head
injuries. Often, players are more focused on getting back out and playing
rather than resting when they are concussed, this is likely due to the league’s
lack of informing players about the true dangers of concussions and long term
brain damage.
Virtue
Theory
Virtue
Theory judges a one’s character based on a variety of characteristics that are
believed to make an individual virtuous. A person or entity has virtues which
decide whether or not this person is succeeding or not. Such virtues can be
characteristics such as intelligence, honesty, care, compassion and many more
that contribute to a virtuous person. The reason these four characteristics are
important in the disagreement between the NHL and its players are because these
are characteristics that the league is not displaying by conducting themselves
in the manner that they have been for years. They have not been intelligent
about how to handle concussions and researching how to prevent concussions,
they have not been honest with their players about the risk of concussions, and
of course, this dishonestly leads to lack of care and compassion for their
players, a major stakeholder in the organization.
Justified
Ethics Evaluation
I personally believe the NHL is acting unethically in
their lack of attention towards concussions and the risks that they include.
Player safety seems to be a real issue within the league at the moment, and it
seems as though instead of working with the players to achieve a safer
environment, they are denying that concussions are even an issue. If there
enough players stepping up to file a lawsuit against the league, it is clear
that concussions are in issue that the NHL needs to address.
References:
Dobuzinskis, Alex. "Concussion Lawsuit against
NHL Can Proceed: U.S. Judge in
Minnesota." Reuters.
Thomson Reuters, 18 May 2016. Web. 06 Apr. 2017.
"NHL Concussion Litigation: Alleging National
Hockey League Concealed Risks of
Concussions." NHL
Concussion Litigation: Alleging National Hockey League Concealed Risks of
Concussions. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLC. Web. 06 Apr. 2017.
Salazar, Heather. "The Business Ethics Case
Manual." The Authoritative Step-by-Step Guide to
Understanding and
Improving the Ethics of Any Business (2014) Web. 06 Apr. 2017.
Active NHL Players Totals by Nationality ‑ 2011‑12 Stats." QuantHockey.
Web. 06 Apr. 2017.
Wheeler, Scott. "Marc Savard on Health and Life
after Hockey." Stanley Cup of Chowder.
Stanley Cup of Chowder,
26 Aug. 2016. Web. 06 Apr. 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment