British Airways: Data Breach (2018)
Who is British Airways?

Ethics Case Controversy
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/64685110/acastro_170629_1777_0008.0.jpg)
With British Airways being one of the largest airlines in the United Kingdom for them to experience a data breach means that millions of their customers are at the risk of having vital information stolen. It is reported that the British Airways are intended to pay a fine nearly $230 million for the data breach that occurred last year (Satariano). Under the European data protection law, this is the largest penalty against a company for privacy lapses. “Frustrated that businesses were not doing enough to protect people’s online information, European policymakers last year adopted a new law, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)” (Satariano). Regulators are cracking down on companies like British Airways because these companies are not under standing the importance of keep their data protected. British Airways has had numerous incidence with data breaches, but they were not as big as the one they faced last year.
Stakeholders
The main stakeholders in this controversy case are the 500,000 customers that got their information stolen through the hack. Out of those 500,000 some has to deal with financial burdens that the hack brought upon them. Even beyond the customers that had their information stolen are investors that are involved with British Airways. Even though this company is rapidly growing investors have to consider whether they want to keep investing in a company that is prone to cyber attacks.
Individualism

Utilitarianism
This theory analyzes a way to maximize happiness. This theory takes the side of the stakeholder and considers their overall happiness with the decisions that were made. In the British Airline case, their overall happiness it due to the lack of decision being made. This theory would view the British Airways case as unethical due to their lack of awareness in protecting their customers' information. “Utilitarianism tells us that we can determine the ethical significance of any action by looking to the consequences of that act” (Dejardins 29). The company’s attention should have been on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain for the stakeholders. They not only caused pain for their customers, but they also are facing consequences by paying a 230 million dollar fine. Even though they were not the ones who orchestrated the cyber attack they are still to blame because they did not take the necessary protocols to avoid it.
Kantianism
The Kant theory states, "...it is wrong to manipulate, exploit, or use people to their own advantage" (Salazar, 21). Not only is this an important part of the theory, but the types of motivations that drives a decision is also a key aspect of this theory. There are three motivations this theory expresses and the one that British Airways does not follow is "the moral law or duty". British Airways had a duty to protect their customers’ information and they neglected to do so. Not everyone knows the risks of booking a flight online so the British Airline should have informed their customers that there is a chance that their information might be exposed to hackers. They would have lost many customers, but putting that information out there would allow customers to choose which would show that the company had good intentions.
Virtue Theory
The Virtue theory asks about a person’s character and assesses whether the person is virtuous. "act so as to embody a variety of virtuous or good character traits and so as to avoid vicious or bad character traits" (Salazar, 17). British Airways lacked in some of the character traits, but there were many traits that the airline company displayed that proved they acted ethically according to this theory. . Honesty, compassion, and care are some of the virtues this theory looks for when analyzing whether a person or company has a good character and this company exhibited those virtues. After the cyber-attack British Airways issued a statement stating that they were shocked that this happened. They had the option to hide this from the public as many companies in the past have done, but they chose to inform the public instead. They also provided financial support to customers who faced any financial burdens.
Justified Ethics Evaluation
In my opinion, I would say that the actions in this case was dealt with reasonably, and I would follow the virtue theory and state that British Airways acted ethically. What they did after the attack shows me if they valued their customers and was truly apologetic about what had happened. First, with the statement they issued about the cyber-attack. It was in a timely manner so people could be informed sooner rather than later. Second, they though to provide help to those who suffered from the cyber-attack. This was a well-played character move instead of a business move. If they thought solely about the business they would not feel the need to issue a statement informing their stakeholders about what happened, and they certainly would not pay their stakeholders for their loss. Taking their aftermath plan into consideration I would stand behind this company. It is hard to avoid an attack, but how a company deals with it can determine the company's success or failure.
Denise Azor
Reference
Calder, Simon.
“Everything You Need to Know about the British Airways Data Breach.” The
Independent,
Independent Digital News and Media, 8 July 2019,
leak-iag-cathay-pacific-information-commissioner-a8993331.html.
DesJardins,
Joseph. An Introduction to Business
Ethics. New York City: The McGraw-Hill
Companies Inc, 2014.
Salazar, Heather. The
Business Ethics Case Manual. n.d.
Satariano, Adam.
“After a Data Breach, British Airways Faces a Record Fine.” The New
York
Times,
The New York Times, 8 July 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/07/08/business/british-
airways-data-breach-fine.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment