Company Logo |
Controversy:
On April 4th 2017, Pepsi released a
commercial including Kendell Jenner, a reality TV star, joining a protest, and
seems to resolve the protests tension with police officers by offering a can of
soda to one of them (Smith).
The 2-minute commercial started with Kendall taking
pictures when she first saw a crowd of protesters walking on the streets with
signs that say “Love” and “Peace.” Jenner then decides to take off her blonde
wig, wipe away her makeup, and join the marchers. Unlike the real world
movements, the ad depicts protesters to look happy and cheerful. After that,
Kendall steps in the frontline of the protesters to grab a can of Pepsi and
hands it to one of the officers. The police officer opens the can and takes a
sip, and everybody cheers.
Kendall Jenner handing a Pepsi can to a police officer (left), while Ieshia is being arrested for standing against police brutality (right). |
After the slam in social media, PepsiCo Inc. had to pull
the ad from YouTube. Pepsi said in an apology: “Pepsi was trying to project a
global message of unity, peace and understanding. Clearly we missed the mark
and we apologize. We did not intend to make light of any serious issue”
(Victor). The controversy did not stop after the apology, as many people had
taken an issue with the company’s apology, stating that Pepsi did not actually
apologize to the people who devoted their lives to fix these problems in our
society. The youngest daughter of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Bernice King,
posted an old picture of her father being pushed back by a police line. She
tweeted: "If only Daddy would have known about the power of #Pepsi" (Smith). Pepsi
immediately responded to Bernice with an apology, saying that "We at Pepsi
believe in the legacy of Dr. King & meant absolutely no disrespect to him
& others who fight for justice" (Smith).
Jenner publicly apologizes for the ad. |
Jenner was also accused of the same
complaint as Pepsi, she said that she feels really bad if she ever offended
anyone, and that she did not know that the ad was going to take a
wrong turn (Yahr). Pepsi also apologized to
Jenner by saying: “We are removing the content and halting any further
roll-out. We also apologize for putting Kendall Jenner in this position."
In my opinion, I believe that the ad is completely Pepsi’s fault, and Pepsi
must take full responsibility in front of the public. Kendall Jenner is only a
21-year-old girl, and offending people clearly was not in her intentions.
Individualism:
When a firm uses its resources in any way that might change its goal to maximize the wealth of shareholders, then the company is stealing from the owners’ money. Friedman suggests that the rule of supply and demand in economics standardize the wage of employees, and the company is technically stealing from owners if it increased employees’ wages (Salazar 18). PepsiCo, Inc. is a company like any of the others. It has the same business goal as every public organization in the United States. Using the company’s capital in a way that affects the wealth of shareholders does not apply under Individualism. Pepsi’s commercial was a misusing of the company’s budget. If Pepsi showed the ad to investors first, they would have voted against publishing it. The stock of Pepsi decreased from $110.22 to $106.69 which cost millions of dollars for some investors
Utilitarianism:
Utilitarianism theory focuses
on the people’s long-term happiness. It was started by Jeremy Bentham back in
1800, and popularized by John Mill after that (Salazar 19). It values the
happiness of every person by maximizing their pleasure and minimizing their
pain. Businesses that use this theory are more concerned of people’s opinions
toward them. Therefore, their business actions and decisions will benefit all
people. Many utilitarians try to analyze actions and decisions of the company,
which will help them measure the costs and benefits of these actions in order
to understand all affected parties. Utilitarianism always shifts its focus to
benefit the stakeholders’ approach (Salazar 19).
Happiness in Utilitarianism is
not measured only on human beings, but also to the environment as a whole.
Thus, utilitarians in businesses would not make actions that will harm the
environment, even if it will generate the most profit for them. Manufacturing,
dumping, and anything that will destroy the ecosystem are all avoided by
Utilitarianism theory unless there are a greater benefit that could be achieved
in the long run. In order for businesses to apply this approach, they would
need to research the long-term benefits or consequences that could happen by
their decisions. Ask questions like who would be happy? Or who would be harmed?
(Salazar 20). For the Pepsi/Kendall issue, Pepsi obviously did not think that
through, and they did not ask themselves some Utilitarianism questions. The ad
clearly harmed many people in many ways. As mentioned before, all the
stakeholders were harmed such as costumers and consumers, communities,
investors, employees, and the government. Therefore, Pepsi was not being
ethical towards its stakeholders as Utilitarianism theory suggests. The
commercial made many people furious because of its meaning, thus, Pepsi failed
to maximize the happiness of everyone.
Kantianism:
Kantianism supports the idea of
rationality, decision-making, honesty, and freedom. It was created by a
philosopher named Immanuel Kant in the late 18th century (Salazar 21).
Kantianism theory teaches us that to be ethical, we must not take advantage of
people that are desperately in need. By giving those people all the information
needed for your products, and not holding any dangerous side effects
information, you are performing the Kantianism theory correctly. It urges
people to understand their role as a member of humanity, and each one of us has
duties to do toward one another (Salazar 21).
The differences between
Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism does not deal with target
numbers such as maximizing profits of shareholders' wealth. It is kind of the
opposite of Utilitarianism since Kantianism does not focus on the consequences
that are made by decisions, but rather the idea of goodwill, which means that
people should have good intentions despite the outcomes (Salazar 21). A
goodwill also means that we must have duties for other people, even if we do
not expect people to do the same for us. Kantianism says that rationality helps
people in need by understanding the circumstances of people in need, and this
will urge us to help them (Salazar 22). Looking at the Pepsi commercial, we can
understand the intentions of Pepsi clearly. Since the beginning of the 2-minute
ad, Pepsi was showing their viewers that revolutions are fun places, and
protestors are cheering happily like nothing is going to happen. However, the
truth is not how Pepsi was depicting it to people, the truth is much more brutal
and disturbing. Many people suffered harshly in these protests, and some people
even lost their lives trying to defend their families. This means that Pepsi was
trying to profit off the pain in which those people have suffered. Using the
pain of others to gain more money is not in any of Kant’s principles.
Virtue Theory:
The Theory of Virtue was
developed way before the rest of business ethics’ theories. It was founded by
the ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle (Salazar 23). Aristotle said that the
people who follow that theory must be rational, and by having this rationality,
they will live a virtuous life. Aristotle also said that in order to be happy,
you need to be virtuous, and in order to be virtuous, you need to be rational. The
theory values most the characteristics that endorse wellness or flourishing of
people in the society. The difference between Virtue theory and the other three
ethical theories is that Virtue theory focuses on an individual’s character,
whereas Kantianism, Utilitarianism, and Individualism are all motivated by
people’s actions (Salazar 23). Aristotle said that a virtue can be found when
any character trait boosts flourishing, and a vice can be found when any
character trait prevents flourishing.
The theory consists of four traits:
honesty, courage, temperance, and justice. In order to be virtuous, people (or
companies) need to apply all four traits of the Virtue theory (Salazar 23). Pepsi
did not apply any traits of the Virtue theory. One part of the theory is
courage, and Pepsi clearly was not courageous because they were copying the
famous image of Ieshia Evans, standing in front of hundreds of officers. Pepsi
did not explain this picture to its viewers, instead, the viewers realized the
meaning themselves. Pepsi also was not honest to its customers about trying to
profit off the people who actually suffered in the Black Lives Matter movement.
Besides, the giant beverage company had no temperance in their ad, because no
one knows what exactly they were trying to achieve. The product is a fizzy drink;
why would the firm have used real world events to promote that particular
product? Finally, Pepsi was not just toward protesters. At the same time the ad
was published, there was a real world revolution in the United States. It is
unjust if Pepsi gains more money at the expense of people’s lives in those
movements.
Work Cited
“Brands.” PepsiCo,
www.pepsico.com/brands.
Kaplan, Jennifer. “What
Went Wrong with Pepsi's Kendall Jenner Ad.” Bloomberg.com, Bloomberg, 5 Apr.
2017, www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-04-05/pepsico-s-panned-ad-shows-risks-of-bringing-commercials-in-house.
Salazar, Heather. The
Business Ethics Case Manual. n.d.
Smith, Alexander. “'We
missed the mark': Pepsi pulls ad featuring Kendall Jenner after controversy.”
NBCNews.com, NBCUniversal News Group, 5 Apr. 2017,
www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/pepsi-ad-kendall-jenner-echoes-black-lives-matter-sparks-anger-n742811.
Victor, Daniel. “Pepsi
Pulls Ad Accused of Trivializing Black Lives Matter.” The New York Times, The
New York Times, 5 Apr. 2017, www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/business/kendall-jenner-pepsi-ad.html.
Yahr, Emily. “Kendall Jenner cries over Pepsi ad backlash
in 'Keeping Up With the Kardashians' premiere.” The Washington Post, WP
Company, 1 Oct. 2017, www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/10/01/kendall-jenner-cries-over-pepsi-ad-backlash-in-keeping-up-with-the-kardashians-premiere/?utm_term=.d6b1646f66dc.
I like this controversy, you really went in detail with it and the theories which I thought was great. Also the pictures are great visual aids. Your post makes me wish mine was longer. Great job
ReplyDeleteAhmed you did a nice job of presenting the case with full details of all parts involved and applying the theories to it. Also, all sources for the controversy are reliable. Well done!
ReplyDelete